Skip to content

Polar Degradation Scenarios — Lupo Di Mare (Italia 12.98 Fuoriserie)

Rev: v2.1  ·  Updated: 2026-06-05

Tactic codes: H- hypothesis prefixes (H-RH/PF/CF/CL/HR) are defined in Routing Hypothesis Labels. Fine-grained T- tactics live in 06_past_winner_routes/routing_tactic_catalog.md.

⚠️ BASE POLAR NOTE — ORR cert VPP is the base

The base polar is now the 2026 ORR Offshore Racing Rule Certificate (Full Measured — USA 12985, Cert #US43225, measured 21-Apr-2026), built into lupo_polar_raw.pol. It is the flat-water, full-crew certificate polar and is HIGH confidence across all angles (certificate VPP, not chart-estimated). S3 (10%) is applied off the ORR base to produce offshore planning speeds. The S3 degradation recommendation stands regardless of polar source. (The cert is final/submitted; the rating is not used here — this is boat-speed only.)


Situation Assessment

The single biggest performance unknown is crew/boat familiarity. The delivery was predominantly motoring or motor-sailing. Race week will be the first real sailing on this boat for this crew.

Default planning scenario elevated from S2 (8%) to S3 (10%) minimum until race week data shows otherwise.

Unknown going in: - Actual boat speeds at any angle in any breeze - Rig tune (mast rake, shroud tensions, forestay sag) - Sail trim reference points for each sail on this boat - Maneuver times on this boat - Instrument calibration (wind angle, boat speed) - Boat motion characteristics in a seaway - Any equipment issues not apparent in delivery

Routing implications: - All hypotheses must hold at S3 - Conservative low-maneuver strategy (H-CL) strongly preferred - H-HR (high-risk/high-reward) is not appropriate for this crew/boat situation - Minimum sail change count is a genuine performance goal


Why Polars Degrade in Offshore Racing

Factor Typical This Race — Assessment
Antifouling condition −2 to −5% UNKNOWN — confirm haul-out date
Sail age / stretch −1 to −3% UNKNOWN — ORR cert measured 21-Apr-2026 (current)
Crew familiarity with boat −0 to −3% (experienced) −5 to −8% (unfamiliar boat)
Crew teamwork (first race together on this boat) −0 to −2% −3 to −5%
Night sailing on unfamiliar boat −1 to −3% −4 to −6%
Rig tune unknown −0 to −2% −3 to −5% until verified
Instrument calibration unknown −0 to −2% Flag — verify during race week
Sail changes delayed −1 to −5% Higher — crew learning the boat's systems
Wave state (Stream chop) −3 to −10% Same as standard

Standard Degradation Scenarios

S0 — Polar baseline (ORR cert VPP, no degradation)

Do not use for this race. This is the flat-water, full-crew certificate polar — no degradation applied. No measured on-the-water data yet to support sailing the boat to the cert. (ORC VPP is a documented cross-check only — see lupo_polar_analysis.md; not the base, not averaged.)

S1 — 5% degradation

Applies when crew knows the boat well, fresh bottom, recent racing. Not applicable for this race.

S2 — 8% degradation

Previous default — elevated for this race. Use after race week once crew has boat-time and confidence is building.

S3 — 10% degradation ← CURRENT PLANNING DEFAULT

Use S3 as the primary planning scenario for all routing runs until race week data shows otherwise. Applies when: new boat to crew, no measured baseline, normal preparation. Use for: primary route evaluation, elapsed time estimates, crew provisioning.

S4 — 15% degradation

Applies when: unfamiliarity + heavy air + tired crew. Specifically relevant for first 24–36 h of the race and any Gulf Stream heavy-air scenario. Use for stress testing — if a strategy doesn't hold at S4, it is genuinely fragile for this crew.


Race Week Calibration Plan

Day 1 — Instrument verification

  • [ ] Calibrate boat speed log (compare GPS SOG in zero current, steady wind)
  • [ ] Calibrate wind instrument: check masthead fly and electronic sensor agree
  • [ ] Record apparent wind angle at a known VMG condition and compare to polar
  • [ ] Note: if instruments are significantly off, the crossover matrix is unreliable

Day 1–2 — Rig tune

  • [ ] Set mast rake to sailmaker recommendation (obtain from North Sails / Austin Powers)
  • [ ] Set shroud tensions to recommended values
  • [ ] Check forestay sag under upwind load
  • [ ] Note backstay tension required for each TWS band

Day 1–2 — Measure actual upwind VMG

  • Sail at best upwind VMG in 12–16 TWS; record TWS, TWA, BSP, heel
  • Compare to ORR cert: BSP 7.17 @39.6° (12 kt), 7.37 @38.0° (16 kt). If within 5% → S2 applies; 5–10% off → stay S3; >10% → rig tune or instrument issue

Day 2–3 — Measure reaching speeds

  • Sail at TWA 90° and 110° in 12–16 TWS with A1 or A1.5-1
  • Compare to ORR cert: 8.82 kts (90°/12 kts), 9.13 kts (110°/12 kts); at 16 kt: 9.20 (90°), 9.71 (110°)
  • If >90% of polar: S2 reasonable; if <90%: stay S3

Day 3 — Maneuver timing

  • Time: one tack, one gybe, one headsail change, one kite set, one kite douse
  • Expected first-attempt times for unfamiliar crew: tack 3–4 min, gybe 4–6 min, kite set 8–12 min
  • These numbers go directly into routing run maneuver cost fields

Pre-race calibration target: If crew consistently within 8% of polar → upgrade to S2 for final routing runs (T-24 brief). If 10–12% off → stay S3, focus on maneuver count reduction.


Routing Strategy Implications — Unfamiliar Boat

Strategy Standard preference This race
H-RH (rhumb, low maneuvers) Baseline comparison ELEVATED — actively attractive
H-PF (pressure-first) Medium Medium — viable if clear
H-CF (current-first) Medium Lower — requires precise execution
H-CL (conservative low-maneuver) For tired crew ELEVATED — appropriate from the start
H-HR (high-risk/reward) For experienced teams DEPRIORITIZE — wrong race for this

Best routing principle for this race: Choose the route that requires the fewest sail changes and gybes. A route at 95% VMG with 4 gybes beats one at 100% VMG with 12 sail changes in the Stream — for this crew, in this race.

Gulf Stream: Don't plan a crossing that banks on a headsail peel inside the current zone — set the correct sail before entering. If conditions change inside, a peel is a deliberate skipper-cleared call; the default is to bear off onto a manageable angle and hold the sail to the exit.


Sensitivity Output Template

For each routing run, record:

Routing Run ID: _______________
Model / GRIB cycle: _______________
Strategy: _______________

Polar degradation sensitivity:
  S0 (0%):   elapsed = ___h ___m   REFERENCE ONLY
  S1 (5%):   elapsed = ___h ___m   NOT APPLICABLE THIS RACE
  S2 (8%):   elapsed = ___h ___m   Post-race-week if calibration validates
  S3 (10%):  elapsed = ___h ___m   ← PRIMARY PLANNING NUMBER
  S4 (15%):  elapsed = ___h ___m   Stress test — must still be viable

Key questions:
  - At S4, is the strategy still better than rhumb? YES / NO
  - How many sail changes does this strategy require?
  - What is the most complex maneuver this strategy requires?
  - Could a less experienced crew execute this in the dark?

ORR Base Speeds for S3 Reference

S3 effective = ORR cert BSP × 0.90. Quick reference (flat-water ORR base → S3 planning speed):

⚠️ The run rows below list VPP VMG-optimal angles (165–169°) for reference only — not steering targets. Lupo's asym is sailed at ~135–150° and gybed down; use those as the operational downwind angle. See note beneath the table.

Point of sail ORR base BSP S3 (×0.90)
Upwind @12 kt (best-VMG angle 39.6°) 7.17 6.45
Upwind @16 kt (best-VMG angle 38.0°) 7.37 6.63
Reach 110° @14 kt 9.44 8.50
Reach 120° @16 kt 9.90 8.91
Run @16 kt (VPP VMG angle 165.7°) 8.09 7.28
Run @20 kt (VPP VMG angle 169.1°) 8.87 7.98

The run rows are the cert's VMG-optimal (VPP) angles — Lupo's asym (tacked on centerline) is not sailed at 165–169°; the crew realises that VMG by gybing downwind on the hot angles (~135–150°), not by soaking square. See the downwind section of lupo_polar_analysis.md.

All base numbers from lupo_polar_raw.pol (ORR cert). Apply the deeper Stream-chop / heavy-air penalties (S4) on top of S3 where the route crosses the Gulf Stream upwind.


Sources

  • Base polar (routing source-of-truth) — 2026 ORR Offshore Racing Rule Certificate (Full Measured), USA 12985, Cert #US43225, measured 21-Apr-2026.
  • Polar filelupo_polar_raw.pol, built from the ORR cert.
  • ORC cross-check (not the base, not averaged)data/2026-05-24 Sail and Polar Info for Brandon/ORC/Italia 12.98 ORC Polars USA 12985.txt; reconciliation in lupo_polar_analysis.md.

Document version: 2.0 — rebased on ORR cert VPP; default elevated to S3 until race week calibration data available

PRE-RACE RESEARCH — not race-period routing advice. Updated 2026-05-29.